Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Planning Literature
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, R. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Public Participation in Hazardous Waste Facility Location Decisions

Richard F. Anderson

Department of Urban Affairs and Planning, Boston University

Public opposition continues to stymie siting of new hazardous waste management facilities in the United States. A review of the literature indicates that much effort has been undertaken in the states to institutionalize public participation in the siting process. However, informal public participation such as public pressure on local elected officials and active passive civil disobedience has been most influential in the denigration of siting proposals. Current state siting procedures suffer from numerous critical flaws: facility needs assessments are rarely performed, and there is much elasticity in the demand for off-site facilities since alternative management options are available; serious and credible environmental sensitivity studies tend to be site specific, but no corresponding regional reference studies indicate that the proposed site is relatively advantageous; and early and meaningful public participation in the siting process has not achieved socially acceptable proposals. These flaws must be addressed effectively in order to provide for safe facilities when they will be needed in the late 1980s and early 1990s.

Journal of Planning Literature, Vol. 1, No. 2, 145-161 (1986)
DOI: 10.1177/088541228600100201


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Waste Manag ResHome page
O. O. Ibitayo
Public-private partnerships in the siting of hazardous waste facilities: the importance of trust
Waste Management Research, June 1, 2002; 20(3): 212 - 222.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
The American Review of Public AdministrationHome page
N. Cohen
Technical Assistance for Citizen Participation: A Case Study of New York City's Environmental Planning Process
The American Review of Public Administration, June 1, 1995; 25(2): 119 - 135.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Planning LiteratureHome page
M. Morrone
Walking a Tight Rope: Planning and the Environmental Movement
Journal of Planning Literature, August 1, 1992; 7(1): 100 - 107.



Home page
Organization EnvironmentHome page
J. D. Kartez
Community planning for industrial risk: a Title III research agenda
Organization Environment, January 1, 1989; 3(1): 61 - 75.
[Abstract] [PDF]