Journal of Planning Literature

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Varady, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by Walker, C. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Planning Literature, Vol. 18, No. 1, 17-30 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0885412203254333

Housing Vouchers and Residential Mobility

David P. Varady

University of Cincinnati, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, National Association of Realtors, Department of Urban Studies at the University of Glasgow, Center for Urban Policy Research, Rutgers University

Carole C. Walker

Center for Urban Policy Research at Rutgers University

Existing research suggests that tenant-based subsidies (housing vouchers) can help to deconcentrate poverty and improve the quality of life of low-income families. The Gautreaux Assisted Housing Program and the Moving to Opportunity (MTO) demonstration program have been shown to help families move to safer neighborhoods and ones with better public schools. The regular Section 8 program has been successful in facilitating moves to low-poverty areas in places like Alameda County, California, but public housing families have had difficulties in Chicago. Research on mixed-income communities has provided little evidence that social mixing has any direct positive impacts through social interaction and/or social networks. However, the lack of research on the long-term impacts on children, such as future improvements in their employment circumstances due to better educational attainment, makes it impossible to offer conclusive assessments on the connection between income mixing and social mobility.

Key Words: housing vouchers • residential mobility • neighborhoods • HOPE VI • mixed-income communities


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Urban StudHome page
D. Mok
Do Two-earner Households Base Their Choice of Residential Location on Both Incomes?
Urban Stud, April 1, 2007; 44(4): 723 - 750.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban Affairs ReviewHome page
M. L. Joseph, R. J. Chaskin, and H. S. Webber
The Theoretical Basis for Addressing Poverty Through Mixed-Income Development
Urban Affairs Review, January 1, 2007; 42(3): 369 - 409.
[Abstract] [PDF]